| Learning
Theory
A theoretical
foundation for Stick With It! lies in the behavior change Theory
of Reasoned Action (TRA) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) developed
by Icek Ajzen and Martin Fishbein. These theories attempt to understand
the correlation between attitudes, intentions and behaviors. TRA
asserts that humans are rational beings, and that they will make
use of information available to them and will consider the consequences
of their actions before deciding whether to or to not engage in
a behavior. It was soon realized that this theory was limited, as
it did not apply to situations where people feel that they have
little control over their behaviors and attitudes. Thus came the
Theory of Planned Behavior that has a strong application to health
education; it is quite often used to understand and predict both
healthy and unhealthy behavior. (Brown 1998)
In
most cases, if teenagers were able to adjust and monitor their behaviors
as they wished, they would not be in need of additional assistance
or support. As evidenced by the information we collected from our
sample group of teenagers, there are multitudes of reasons why teenagers
might feel that is not in their volitional control to change their
risky behaviors. An important factor in TPB is the idea of behavioral
intent, which is an indication of how much of an effort an individual
will exert in order to perform a behavior. Behavioral intent is
influenced by 3 components, all of which we will address in Stick
With It:
-
Attitudes: One’s evaluation of the behavior in
question. We are targeting teenagers who will already have the
desired attitude, yet lack the ability to enact it on their own.
The education aspect of the website will also address these attitudes
at length.
- Subjective
Norm: The influence of perceived social pressure on an individual
to perform or not perform a behavior. The peer aspect of our website
will give teenagers a positive social pressure to change, ideally
strong enough to combat the social pressure that occurs in the
other parts in their lives.
-
Perceived Behavioral Control: The belief of how easy
or difficult it will be to change a behavior. This is essentially
the crux of what Stick With It! is addressing with young people;
their self-efficacy around their belief that they can effect change
within themselves.
Albert
Bandura’s theories go one step beyond the TPB and asserts
that self-efficacy is the main determining factor in whether or
not people will change their behaviors. In order to raise self-efficacy
levels, thereby increasing the likelihood of a positive change in
behavior, people need guided mastery experiences – experiences
that allow them to safely and successfully practice their desired
behavior. The idea of the cell phone intervention fits in well with
the idea of mastery experiences; eventually, the scaffold fades
and individuals are able to succeed on their own.
We
modeled our surveys after Bandura’s self-efficacy scales as
they had a great deal of relevancy to both the subject matter and
the target audience we were dealing with. We realize, however, that
self-efficacy is a difficult thing to accurately measure, so we
developed additional survey questions as well.
Another
area where Stick With It draws strong theoretical support is from
peer education. Peer education uses young people as credible prevention
messengers to effect change among other young people; it has been
proven to be a highly effective prevention strategy with youth.
Peer education has been successful both at the individual level,
in changing attitudes and skills, and also at the societal level
in influencing group norms. Peer education is consistent with several
behavior change theories, among them social learning theory, the
theory of reasoned action, the diffusion of innovation theory, and
the theory of participatory education. Additionally, a report called
Generation rx.com by the Kaiser Family Foundation asserts that “Hearing
the real experiences of other people their own age is very important.”
(Rideout December 2001)
The
Theory of Planned Behavior, or, more accurately, a shortcoming of
TPB, also supports the use of a mobile phone when attempting to
change behavior. A limitation to the theory is that the longer the
time interval between the behavioral intention and the behavior
itself, the less likely it is that the desired behavior will occur.
This is why we believe the mobile phone component of our product
has a unique opportunity to move beyond existing alternatives—it
offers the possibility to insert itself and remind a teenager of
their behavioral intent in the moment where they are forced to make
a decision about their behavioral actions.
An
area where Stick With It! goes beyond existing alternatives is that
it not only addresses the strategic and educational task of working
with young people to change their behavior, but also empowers them
to design a plan that they can use in the moment of conflict. Most
approaches to changing teen behaviors fall short when it comes to
intervention at the time and place that it is necessary to enact
the desired behavior. Our product will bridge the gap between learning
the information and putting it into action in the teen’s own
environment, where and when it is most needed.
We
plan on using a blended strategy of learning theories in developing
Stick With It, incorporating cognitive, situative, and behaviorist
principles.
- Cognitive:
Our design addresses the meta-cognitive skills of setting goals,
strategizing around those goals, continually evaluating outcomes,
and reflecting on the process.
-
Situative: Situative learning theory will be
employed as teens will be assisted where and when they need support,
as well as incorporating working with peers groups to help plan,
evaluate, and reflect on their learning. Stick With It! will also
allow the young people to design the intervention strategy that
they believe will work for them.
- Behaviorist:
Lastly our design addresses changing or modifying the specific
behaviors young people want to work on, ideally using the repeating
cycle of education, reflection, and intervention.
|