The First STEP: New Teachers Learning Technology

Goals

Guiding Questions

Methodology

Findings
- Learning Problems
- Learning Process
- Raw Data


Analysis
- Cultural/Institutional
- Social/Interactional
- Individual


Design Implications


Amy Greenhouse
Cathy SooHoo

 

Design Implications

This study introduced us to the varied and nuanced learning problems facing young teachers.  Although they did not consider themselves technically savvy and did not express comfort with the technology, both students were highly motivated to learn.  When they did learn how to use a new technology, they were eager to master it.  This study provides convincing evidence for the necessity of a technology-training program, and even indicates the need to expand the program throughout the year.

·        Teaching/learning method

-         Build students’ self-efficacy by making it seem possible to acquire the skills, minimize competitive social comparisons, highlight personal achievements, and give students more control over their learning environment.

-         Provide one-to-one tutoring that will allow the student to control the pace of learning and allow for extra review time with an expert guide.

-         Provide written or on-line, step-by-step instructions on how to use applications covered in class, so students have a chance to review.

·        Curriculum

-         Teach Powerpoint and other user-friendly applications before teaching the more difficult web design software.

-         Teach FrontPage instead of Netscape Composer because it has an interface that is more familiar to most people.

-         Integrate coursework from other classes into the technology class instead of inventing new projects specifically for the technology class.

-         Provide more concrete, specific ideas on how to use technology in the classroom.

·        Policy

-         Do not assume that recent college graduate received technological training from their undergraduate institution. 

-         Offer technology workshops throughout the year for STEP students, so students will have the opportunity to practice their skills and learn new ones. These workshops should not be academic or stressful.

Teresa’s parting words: This is doable, right?

 

References:

Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control.  New York: Freeman.

Busch, Tor. 1995.  “Gender Differences in Self-efficacy and Attitudes Towards Computers.”  Journal of Educational Computing Research 12: 147-58. 

Ploetzner, Rolf S., Pierre  Dillenbourg, Michael Preier and David Truman. 1999.  Learning by Explaining to Oneself and to Others.  In Pierre Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S.  1995.  The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving.  In C.E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.  Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.     

Smith, James. 1994.  “The Effects of Education on Computer Self-efficacy.”  Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 31: 51-65.